otkaznik (otkaznik) wrote,


...Thus, to come nearer our subject, there may have been a number of solutions to the problems posed by Russia of the ’twenties which the Communists could not have chosen because they were Communists, and in considering the practical alternatives before them we have to bear this in mind. In doing so, we are by no means driven to any generalisations about the "inevitability" of the Russian revolution or of the Bolshevik seizure of power, and afortiori we need not assume that non-Bolsheviks could not have found some other ways of coping with the problems of the period. (Indeed, thour:h the problems would still have been acute, they might in important respects have been different.) Before his assassination in 1911, the last intelligent Tsarist prime minister, Stolypin, expressed the belief that his land reform measures would create in about twenty years a prosperous peasantry which would provide a stable foundation for society and the throne. No one will know if he would have been right, if he had not been murdered, if the Tsar had been wise, if Rasputin had not existed, if the war had not broken out .... But of what use is it to indulge in such speculations? A 19th-century Russian blank-verse play provides, if somewhat inaccurately, a relevant comment:

If grandma had a beard,

She would be grandpa ....


Tags: СССР, историческое, книги, лингвистическое, филологическое
  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened