otkaznik (otkaznik) wrote,

Про Китай

Кто там кивает на Китай как надежду всех надежд? Enjoy. Из журнала Economist.

OWNERSHIP is rarely straightforward in China. After Mao Zedong died and land was opened up for commercial development, each plot came with only a 50-year government lease. No one knows what will happen when those leases expire. Yet building projects continue apace.

Foreign investors face a similar conundrum. Several Chinese industries, such as mining, steel, education, telecommunications and the internet, are both capital-hungry and politically sensitive. They need foreign investment, but the law bans foreigners from owning stakes in them.

Eager investors and canny locals have found ways around the rules. Perhaps the most important is the creation of a complex investment vehicle called a “variable interest entity” (VIE). It works like this: valuable Chinese assets are placed in a Chinese company. This entity, the VIE, must be run by a Chinese citizen. A series of contracts are then arranged, shifting the returns from the VIE first to a foreign-owned company registered in China and then to an offshore company, perhaps in the Cayman Islands.

There are signs, however, that the Chinese government has begun to frown on VIEs. In 2006 the Ministry of Information, which regulates internet firms, said it was taking a look at them. In 2009 three other ministries announced that VIEs were banned for companies involved in internet games.

Berating Buddha

In March, says Thomas Shoesmith, an attorney with Pillsbury, a global law firm, a $38m bond offering in America for a company called Buddha Steel was withdrawn after authorities in Hebei province blocked its VIE with a local steel plant. Officials said that the very existence of a VIE contravened Chinese management and public policies. An anxious debate followed: was this the random act of a single region, or a wake-up call from Beijing?

A dispute between Alibaba, a Chinese internet group, and Yahoo!, an American firm that owns 43% of Alibaba through a VIE, suggests the latter. The Alibaba VIE recently transferred a valuable asset (Alipay, an online-payments firm) to a local Chinese company controlled by Jack Ma, Alibaba’s chairman. Yahoo! was outraged. Alibaba claims it had no choice. It says it was warned by China’s central bank that Alipay would not be allowed to operate if it was, in effect, partly foreign-owned.

In theory, the same problem could afflict the rest of the Alibaba Group. But Alibaba says its other operations will be unaffected because they fall under a less fussy regulator, the Ministry of Information.

Perhaps so, but Mr Gillis, who has long blogged about the potential pitfalls of VIEs, is suddenly getting lots of attention. Alibaba is not unique. Other firms with VIE structures are also involved in electronic payments. At least one has a foreign partner. Now that the issue is in the news, China is under pressure to spell out what is permissible, and what is not. The risk that big foreign firms will suddenly find that their investments in China are illegal or worthless is surely remote. Or is it?


Tags: клоуны

  • (no subject)

    Илларионовы кричат, что в Америке демократия кончилась, потому что свободы там больше нет. Кончилась свобода слова, самая главная свобода. А слово…

  • Tim Snyder

    Post-truth is pre-fascism, and Trump has been our post-truth president. When we give up on truth, we concede power to those with the wealth…

  • (no subject)

    Илларионова из института Катона таки выгнали. Интересно, в какой степени это оказалось для него неожиданностью. Предполагаю, что он шел на баррикаду…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened